|
|
Questions each web is most responsible for exploring and flowing | | | | | *What do maps contribute to governance & sustainability that numbers alone never can?
*How do the world's busiest people study
a deep issue in an hour and choose whether to network collaboratively around it for ever more? I
realise this looks a bit too simple. One contextual issue is that at the start of the year we held a collaboration cafe in Dhaka where we listed the 20 tools citizens most use to openly interconnect their deepest innovation queries:
summits, virtual platforms, project hubs, youtubes, yahoogroups, universities, .... and asked who (which cities) knows
who to interface these around world changing methodologies like microcredit); what methods or cultures do great collaboration cities use that poor ones dont? We also published our intitial findings in a world citizen guide that was handed out at a 700 person collaboration meeting in london | | | | | | | Which experiments for humanity are peoples in your nation celebrating most openly? Why have the conventional ignorances of entrepreneurial revolution got worse every year since we started questioning
them in The Economist of 1976! St James ER study circles : 1 2 3 4 5 6 | | | | | | |
Who is Changing Philanthropy?
What organisation's
models can end the White Man's Burden
of charity? What is WMB: WMB1 charity dollar's get one-time
spending never investing; WMB2 global charity controls
from above never transfers knowhow; WMB3 charity ticks performance in boxes not flows that
community impact accountancy needs to develop around; WMB4 charity has seldom destabilised
a corrupt regime relying on expediency of working within a broken system than stepping back and seeing how whole change is
needed if ever more vicious spirals onto the poorest people are not to be compounded by inconvenient truth; WMB5
Charity as it has evolved in globalisation's last 30 years has had terrifying influence on mass media- with
commercial media it has paid exorbitant sums to ad messages that should have been free speech if they truly were life-saving,
with public media it has censored debates that could have identified Charity's systemic follies and burdens -its accidental
vicious systemisation and cumulative impacts have put "democratic" governments on the defensive where we needed
openness and diverse curiosity of leadesrhip, and made the interface between global charity and national governments
one of the root causes of loss of sustainability of our species
| | | Does economics
(or any of the metrics or law-making professins) have any maps at deep context and conflict resolution levels
needed for changing philanthropy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|