We often say that
globalization is a reality that we must contend with. We also say that
globalization offers opportunities
as much as it poses challenges. That people and nations must
learn to deal with both. But, there are still
many unsettled questions pertaining to globalization.
Even the discipline of economics has not addressed
the phenomenon in a holistic manner. For
example, while there is enormous, and quite longstanding literature
on the benefits of free trade in
goods and free flow of capital, the literature and policy on the free
movement of people remains
scanty and patchy.
There are questions pertaining to the
globalization of lifestyles, and its consequences for
consumption, and their impact on the world environment.
Is growth sustainable if development in
the developing world merely mirrors the experience of the developed?
It is not just that Third World
households may not be able to afford western consumption standards, our
planet would not be able
to do so.
If every consumer in India and in China, totaling
up to almost 3 billion, want to live like people in
San Francisco, Stockholm or Singapore, can they afford
to? Can nature afford it? If not, how do we
alter lifestyles and consumption patterns so that the growth
process is sustainable in a more
globalized world?
I believe, a new generation of economists
and social scientists have to once again write and draw on
blank slates, like
IG’s generation did. There are, I believe, no textbook solutions. There are no pet
answers, no clever models. The rise of
Asia, and of the developing world in general, presents us
with new challenges –
new intellectual challenges, new technological challenges, new organizational and political
challenges